Tensions in understanding inclusive education: conceptual and practical dilemmas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.12.2.512

Keywords:

Inclusive education; euphemism; collective indifference; ontological problem of social groups; educational policies

Abstract

This paper analyzes the building blocks of the rationality system of inclusive education, confirming that its application to teacher training and public policies establish categories through which they are placed tactically at the service of power. Each of these is used to speak for specific purposes, leading to the legitimization of an innocent fraud in which inclusive education approaches are cross-dressed with the force of the special, giving itself a benign and potentially new face that does not undo the problems introduced by the neoliberal educational imagination. Its objective is to critically analyze the impacts that arise from the lack of epistemic-conceptual and methodological clarity that inclusive education faces in the management of public policies and teacher training and their transfer to educational communities. The methodology used in this work was that of critical documentary review. It concludes, stating that inclusive education addresses issues related to the nature of exclusion, justice and educational transformation and the problem that designate the ownership of human rights in the school experience in the absence of ethical and social responsibility of educational systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball, S. (1990). “Management as moral technology: A luddite analysis”; en: Ball, S. (Comp.). Foucault and Education: disciplines and Knowledge. (pp.153-166). London: Routledge.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Braidotti, R. (2018). A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 1, 1–31.

Burman, E. (1998). La deconstrucción de la psicología evolutiva. Madrid: Visor.

Fanon, F. (2009). Piel negra, máscaras blancas. Madrid: Akal.

Guattari, F. (1992). Caosmosis. París: Galilée.

Hill Collins, P. (2008). “Rasgos distintivos del pensamiento feminista negro”; en: Fabardo, M. (Edit.). Feminismos negros. Una antología. (pp.99-133). Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

hooks, b. (2019). La teoría como práctica liberadora. Nómadas, 50, 123-135.

Kyrole, K., Koivunen, A. & Ryberg, A. (2019). Vulnerability as political language. Recuperado el 24 de junio de 2020: https://www.manchesteropenhive.com/view/9781526133113/9781526133113.00005.xml

Levinas, E. (2006). Totalidad e Infinito. Salamanca: Sígueme.

Luzt, H. (2015). Intersectionality as. DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1-2, 39-44.

McLaren, P. (1994). Pedagogía crítica y cultura depredadora. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Ocampo, A. (2017). Epistemología de la educación inclusiva. Granada: UGR.

Ocampo, A. (2018). La formación del profesorado y la comprensión epistemológica de la educación inclusiva: tensiones, permeabilidades y contingencias. Santiago: Fondo Editorial CELEI.

Ocampo, A. (2019). Contornos teóricos de la educación inclusiva. Revista Boletín Redipe, Vol. 8 (3), 66-95.

Ocampo, A. (2020). En torno al verbo incluir: performatividades heurísticas de la educación inclusiva. Quaest.disput, 13 (27), 18-54.

Slee, R. & Weiner, G. (2002). “Introducción: ¿Eficacia para quién?”; en: Slee, R. & Weiner, G. (Comp.). ¿Eficacia para quién? Crítica de los movimientos de las escuelas eficaces y de la mejora escolar. (pp.7-20). Madrid: Akal.

Slee, R. (2012). La escuela extraordinaria. Exclusión, escolarización y educación inclusiva. Madrid: Morata.

Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2017). Applying intersectionality as a method A critical analysis of how to apply feminist and intersectional methodologies in qualitative research. Recuperado el 09 de febrero de 2021 de: <https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/365488/Thesis%20Gender%20Studies%20-%20Amber%20Ottilie%20van%20Witteloostuijn%20%283841359%29%20->.

Young, I.M. (2002). Justicia y Política de la Diferencia. Valencia: Cátedra.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-15

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Ocampo González, A. (2021). Tensions in understanding inclusive education: conceptual and practical dilemmas. Comuni@cción: Journal of Research in Communication and Development, 12(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.12.2.512

Similar Articles

1-10 of 295

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.